![]() “We knew it would be the majority,” she added, but this “just underscores that the ‘but we are persecuting other people too’ argument … is not convincing.” New cases are still being opened under the Biden administration. Those numbers are “really high,” said Margaret Lewis, a law professor at Seton Hall University who has written extensively about the China Initiative. This includes American citizens who are ethnic Chinese and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, as well as citizens and others associated with Taiwan, Hong Kong, and long-standing communities of the Chinese diaspora in Southeast Asia. Our analysis shows that of the 148 people indicted under the China Initiative, 130 – or 88% – are of Chinese origin. ![]() Justice Department officials have repeatedly denied that the China Initiative is engaged in racial profiling, but people of Chinese descent, including American citizens, have been disproportionately affected by the initiative. One of the earliest and most persistent criticisms of the China Initiative was that it could lead to increased racial profiling of people of Chinese descent, Asian Americans and Asian immigrants. Results for the defendants under the China InitiativeĪlmost 90% of all cases are brought against persons of Chinese origin. Analysis of federal statistics by the Pew Research Center. This is in stark contrast to the usual outcomes of federal criminal cases, where the vast majority end up with a plea of guilt. While eight cases are pending, seven cases against scientists have ended in dismissal or acquittal, and six have ended in plea or conviction. In particular, many research integrity cases fell apart. Of the 95 people still facing charges, 71 are not prosecuted because the accused is in an unknown location or cannot be extradited. Almost two thirds of cases – 64% – have not yet been reviewed. Of the 148 defendants, only 40 pleaded guilty or were found guilty, and the charges were often less serious than those initially charged. Three years after the start of the program, less than a third of the defendants of the China Initiative have been convicted. (At least four cases of trade secret theft involve participation in a talent program.)įederal officials have repeatedly stated that participation in talent programs is not illegal, although they have also called they are, according to Bill Priestap, a former assistant director of counterintelligence at the FBI, “brain-raising programs” that “encourage the theft of intellectual property from US institutions.”Ĭhina Initiative’s Cases Not As Successful As Justice Department Claims (One research integrity case in 2020 also included a charge of violating the EEA.)Īt least 14 of these research conscientiousness cases arose from suspicions stemming from links to “talent programs,” in which Chinese universities provide financial incentives for scientists to conduct research, teach, or return other activities to a sponsoring institution. By 2020, 16 of 31 (52%) newly reported cases were. In 2018, none of the case studies focused on research integrity. Our analysis reveals a significant shift towards academics, starting in 2019 and continuing through 2020. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |